Search for: "People v. Superior Court (Marks"
Results 21 - 40
of 456
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2010, 2:47 pm
Other Superior Court judges named Wednesday are: Mark V. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 11:09 am
A more surgical response is to remedy the deficiency by reading in the under-inclusive indigency provision in the Rules to include people who are “in need”: see Schachter v. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 10:04 am
., woman is the first to be awarded human rights damages by the Ontario Superior Court in a wrongful dismissal action under relatively new provisions of the Ontario Human Rights Code.Wilson v. [read post]
9 Apr 2023, 9:30 pm
[On Tuesday, April 4, Georgetown Law devoted a session of its faculty workshop to honoring the publication of The Hughes Court: From Progressivism to Pluralism, 1930-1941 (Cambridge University Press, 2022), a volume in the Oliver Wendell Holmes Devise History of the Supreme Court of the United States, by Mark V. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 6:30 am
**Courts Matter Or They Don’t**The first third of Mark’s book synthesizes and expands on some rueful academic analyses of the Supreme Court, including how the Court failed to dismantle racial subordination in the aftermath of Brown v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 6:30 am
Recent United States Supreme Court decisions, such as Shelley v. [read post]
Case Law, Canada: Baglow v Smith, defence of “fair comment” succeeds in landmark blogging libel case
4 Mar 2015, 4:50 pm
In a judgment handed down on 23 February 2015 ( [2015] ONSC 1175), the Ontario Superior Court of Justice held that the operators of a right wing message board were publishers of defamatory material concerning a left wing blogger. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 11:09 am
The Court of Appeals also disagreed with the sanctions imposed by the Superior Court. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 2:47 pm
Other Superior Court judges named Wednesday are: Mark V. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 5:12 am
Mendoza, 722 F.2d 96, 97 n.1 (5th Cir. 1983).7 We agree with the majority of the Courts of Appeals that have addressed this issue and find that by failing to raise the issue of standing in the Superior Court, the People have waived the issue on appeal. [read post]
4 May 2011, 11:13 am
Superior Court, 36 Cal. 4th 148, 113 P. 3d 1100 (2005), the court found that the arbitration provision was unconscionable because AT&T had not shown that bilateral arbitration adequately substituted for the deterrent effects of class actions. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 5:58 am
Missouri media lawyer Mark Sableman has this article in St. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 9:06 am
Not an easy decision by the Superior Court; but the right one. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 1:03 pm
Eli Lilly & Co., 3AN-06-05630 CI, Alaska Superior Court (Anchorage), have been limited but interesting thus far. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 4:56 pm
(People ex rel. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 4:52 pm
(Superior Court of Santa Clara County, No. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 10:45 am
From State v. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 11:09 pm
San Diego County Superior Court (Guadalupe T. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 7:56 am
Innovation Ventures, LLC v. [read post]
11 May 2017, 11:45 am
On May 3, 2017, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case, Anthony Rush and Tammy Rush v. [read post]
