Search for: "People v. Superior Court (Marks"
Results 81 - 100
of 455
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2006, 5:38 pm
The Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL) Court Schedule Court Summary, Week Ending 8 September 2006 Case Resources: The Civil Defence Forces (CDF) Accused The Revolutionary United Front (RUF) Accused The Armed Forces Revolutionary Council (ARFC) Accused Prosecutor v. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 5:31 am
The burn marks in the stairway carpet corroborated their testimony. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 11:37 am
People who want their day in court should be able to have it. [read post]
10 May 2023, 3:43 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 9:30 am
Seven people were killed, several more injured.Read the full decision at: Ontario (Labour) v. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 5:57 pm
The Ontario Superior Court of Justice released a decision in R. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2022, 6:16 am
By Mark A. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:03 am
Rogers v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Inst. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 8:07 pm
--City of East Lake v. [read post]
2 May 2013, 10:46 am
In Broca v. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 6:51 am
Payne v. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
" Id. at 998 (citation and quotation marks omitted). [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 2:42 pm
The court did discuss US v. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 9:11 am
Moreover, under the rule of Marks v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 2:40 am
The judgment of the General Court in Case T? [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 7:39 am
This post examines a recent opinion from the Superior Courtof New Jersey – Appellate Division: Roberts v. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 8:54 am
A very recent appeals court ruling in a case out of the bankruptcy court in Los Angeles, Eden Place v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 3:27 pm
S. 552, 561- 562 (1988) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 4:29 am
At PrawfsBlawg, Richard Re remarks that although “the justices ultimately chose not to address the precedential significance of 4-1-4 decisions,” “the Court’s ruling still managed to undermine one of the main defenses of the Marks rule” for extracting precedent from fragmented opinions, which finds the Marks rule “desirable because it aligns with the ‘predictive model’ of precedent, whereby lower courts… [read post]
