Search for: "People v. Superior Court (Persons)"
Results 41 - 60
of 2,106
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jan 2013, 10:53 am
As also is evident, this case is indistinguishable from People v Zanghi. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 5:12 am
’ (People v. [read post]
6 May 2020, 2:11 pm
In Marez v. [read post]
20 Aug 2021, 11:04 am
Socialist People’s Libyan Arab Jamahiriya. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 5:42 am
Superior Court is a mass action brought by more than 600 plaintiffs in a California state court. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 5:42 am
Superior Court is a mass action brought by more than 600 plaintiffs in a California state court. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 1:20 pm
British Columbia’s judges cannot preside over out-of-province hearings but may use video conferencing to connect with B.C. courtrooms from afar, under an appeal court ruling.Endean v. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 12:28 pm
CA221322Superior Court No. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 11:41 am
Last week, the Utah Court of Appeals issued a decision in the case of Utah Alunite Corp. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 6:15 am
Ultimately, the trial court order was vacated and the case remanded.Anyone wishing to review the Pennsylvania Superior Court's decision in the case of McWeeney v. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 8:34 am
In the criminal case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 11:58 pm
And, as here, the person who suffers will be a third party (the victim), who -- as here -- doesn't get paid even a smidgeon of her injuries and medical (or, as here, funeral) bills, because the insurance caps out at $25,000 per person and $50,000 total and the people who own and drove the car are (as here) judgment proof.Plus, I've got a great little business model after today's opinion. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 8:51 am
The California Court of Appeal, in a nicely-reasoned opinion in Burdick v Superior Court, recently held that posting allegedly defamatory statements about a person on a Facebook page, even while knowing that person resides in the forum state [California, in this case], is insufficient in itself to create the minimum contacts necessary to support specific personal jurisdiction in a lawsuit arising out of that posting. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:57 am
Superior Court (2010) 184 Cal.App.4th 825, 836 [“while Discover Bank is a case about unconscionability, the rule set forth in Gentry is concerned with the effect of a class action waiver on unwaivable rights regardless of unconscionability”]; People v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 1:29 pm
Yes, according to the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. [read post]
11 May 2020, 1:57 pm
Not much from the California appellate courts today; one published decision each from the Court of Appeal and the Ninth Circuit.Instead of talking about either of those two (somewhat pedestrian) opinions, I thought I'd briefly mention this opinion from the Appellate Division of the Superior Court instead. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 10:04 am
Would a jury think that knowingly "approaching" a person included standing still? [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 7:54 am
Hence you lose.The lesson for the day is not to wait to sue dead people. [read post]
26 Dec 2008, 4:57 pm
On December 19, 2008, in Party City Corp. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 6:55 pm
Although you may feel that this does not apply to you, the court in Rippy v. [read post]
