Search for: "People v. Superior Court (Persons)" Results 41 - 60 of 2,116
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2024, 6:44 am by INFORRM
The Ontario Superior Court of Justice assessed defamation damages aggregating $4,773,000 in a case involving claims by 53 plaintiffs against one individual defendant over a targeted campaign involving tens of thousands of postings on the internet. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 4:17 pm by Thomas B. Griffith
 22-7163, Judge Rao, joined by Judges Katsas and Pan, affirmed the decision of the district court to remand to the Superior Court of the District of Columbia a suit brought by the District asserting that various oil and gas companies violated D. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 4:00 am by Amy Salyzyn
Following critiques by some that the disclosure requirements embedded in these practice directions were too vague and potentially an overreach (see, e.g. here and here), some other Canadian courts – including the Superior Court of Quebec and three Alberta courts collectively – opted to simply caution the profession and parties about AI use rather than create new disclosure mandates. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
People often think that “marriage” and “family” are synonymous, but these words are not interchangeable in law. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 6:31 am by Bob Ambrogi
Traction: We are adding about 25 people a day as registrants, having fully launched in late October 2023, and have begun demos with attorneys. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am by INFORRM
Last week in the courts Between 27 November and 1 December 2023, Collins Rice J continued to hear the trial in the case of Blake v Fox. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 5:24 am by centerforartlaw
Clearly a great number of people know who Banksy is and are unwilling to share the information. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
While is why the Sixth Circuit (over a dissent) just applied Chevron and Rust v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 11:16 am by Eric Goldman
The court says: “SB 419 completely bans a platform where people speak, so it directly implicates speech…[and yet] SB 419 could be seen as a restriction on the time, place, or manner that a person could speak in the public forum—that is, the Internet. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 7:12 am by Guest Author
Based on my personal interactions, most lawyers seem to think little of the nondelegation claim in SEC v. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
Through her personal lens and professional lens as a Puerto Rican complex trauma therapist, Natalie explains how historical and cultural trauma is experienced by Black people, Indigenous people and People of Colour – and how cultural burdens and legacies inform our relationships and internal family systems. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 5:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
In the recent decision Canadian Pacific Railway Company v Teamsters Canada Rail Conference, Ontario’s Superior Court of Justice heard a matter that arose out of an employer’s alleged violation of employee privacy. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 5:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
In the recent decision Canadian Pacific Railway Company v Teamsters Canada Rail Conference, Ontario’s Superior Court of Justice heard a matter that arose out of an employer’s alleged violation of employee privacy. [read post]