Search for: "People v. Superior Court (Persons)" Results 81 - 100 of 2,118
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm by Andrew Warren
The statute covers a very wide variety of federal officers and people acting under the direction of federal officers–including elected officials, federal civil employees, federal law enforcement officers, judges, postal workers, military officers, and more. [read post]
26 Aug 2023, 7:50 pm by Uthman Law Office
The  superior court permitted the People to withdraw a pending petition for revocation of parole that CDCR filed against Escobedo, who was on lifetime parole when he committed his offense. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 5:33 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Most people have not had the experience of attending a court proceeding or testifying under oath. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 10:26 am by Kevin LaCroix
Indeed, in McDonald’s II, the court reached back before Caremark to the 1963 Delaware Supreme Court decision in Graham v. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 11:58 pm
And, as here, the person who suffers will be a third party (the victim), who -- as here -- doesn't get paid even a smidgeon of her injuries and medical (or, as here, funeral) bills, because the insurance caps out at $25,000 per person and $50,000 total and the people who own and drove the car are (as here) judgment proof.Plus, I've got a great little business model after today's opinion. [read post]
30 Jul 2023, 1:27 pm by Thomas James
July 14, 2023) (Complaint originally filed in Gwinnett County, Georgia Superior Court on June 5, 2023; subsequently removed to federal court) This is a defamation action against OpenAI, the company responsible for ChatGPT. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 3:51 am
Source: https://www.casebriefs.com/blog/law/torts/torts-keyed-to-vetri/negligent-infliction-of-emotional-distress-torts-keyed-to-vetri/burgess-v-superior-court/Read More [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 8:02 am by David J. Halberg, Esq.
Attorneys fighting for victims of decades-old child sexual abuse, the March 2023 Third District Court of Appeals’ ruling in Doe v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 6:13 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
After the Supreme Court invalidated the use of race in college admissions in SFFA v. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 8:05 am
At the Atlantic, Adam Serwer critiques Justice Thomas's analysis of the original meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause in the Court's Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 2:18 pm by Giles Peaker
Secondly: in the second part of the decision in Khan, the Court of Appeal resolved the tension between Avon Ground Rents Ltd v Child (2018) UKUT 204 (LC) and John Romans Park Homes Ltd v Hancock, 17 October 2019 (His Honour Judge Martin Rodger KC), unreported. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 8:28 am by Michael Oykhman
The chief justice then designated a superior court judge to impanel a 12-member jury to hear and determine the application. [read post]