Search for: "People v. Superior Court (Persons)"
Results 141 - 160
of 2,116
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2018, 8:48 am
This Tuesday, the Supreme Court held in Jesner et al. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2007, 8:53 pm
"People expect, and are entitled to expect, that the government will not share [confidential personal] information without their consent," said the court. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 2:50 pm
Each week, Wise Law Blog reviews recent decisions by the Ontario Court of Appeal.Ontario (Labour) v. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 8:52 am
The Ontario Superior Court of Justice has ruled that Canadians have no expectation of privacy in their online identity. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 3:51 pm
I generally like the published opinions of the Appellate Division of the Superior Court. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 5:00 am
Superior Court, supra, 113 Cal.App.4th at p. 858; Hicks v. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 6:19 am
The Superior Court – Appellate Division affirmed Spriggs's conviction in People v. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 9:58 am
Risher will argue that retention of DNA from innocent people violates the California Constitution’s privacy protections, which are meant to block overbroad collection and unlawful searches of personal data. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 11:55 am
Here's the answer.The Appellate Division of the Superior Court of Fresno decides, in a published opinion, that the answer is yes. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 11:31 am
The Court distinguished Mechling v. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 11:43 am
The Superior Court of Pennsylvania in Ruehling v. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 3:12 am
Stas in 2012 appears to have adopted a three-part test defined by the Superior Court, Appellate Division in 1988’s State v. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 2:17 pm
” As explained by the California Supreme Court in Patterson v. [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 12:22 pm
Superior Court * Having a Facebook or Twitter Account Shouldn’t Mean Mandatory California Vacations if You Get Sued * Consumer Reviews at “Local” Review Sites Don’t Support Jurisdiction–Wilkerson v. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 10:34 am
And that finally brings us to the current Court of Federal Claims decision, Superior Optical Labs, Inc., v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 9:00 am
The trial court erred by proceeding with trial without determining whether Disandro’s absence was both “knowing and voluntary,” Justice Manuel Ramirez wrote in People v. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 2:08 pm
In R. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 10:04 am
., woman is the first to be awarded human rights damages by the Ontario Superior Court in a wrongful dismissal action under relatively new provisions of the Ontario Human Rights Code.Wilson v. [read post]
4 Jul 2008, 8:09 am
Once again, I am indebted to Magistrate Marcia Linsky of the Allen County (Indiana) Superior Court for an interesting new decision. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 9:51 am
A California Superior Court confirmed that Harris was right in 2013, and indeed Section 230 clearly prevents the prosecution. [read post]
