Search for: "People v. Superior Court (Persons)"
Results 161 - 180
of 2,116
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2024, 8:39 am
The trial court denied the request and on May 8, 2024 the Superior Court affirmed. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 4:13 am
Patino, RI: Superior Court 2012 no. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 8:20 am
”The appeal court judges went on to agree with those findings on the issue of limits to security of the person. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 5:03 am
” Burwell v. [read post]
2 Jul 2006, 8:43 pm
The court cited to the case of McKevitt v. [read post]
6 May 2021, 4:00 am
Myers, Ontario Superior Court of Justice in Arconti v. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 2:14 pm
Superior Court (Pearson) (2010) 48 Cal.4th 564, 571.)People v. [read post]
20 Aug 2021, 3:42 am
Some jobs require people to travel on a regular basis, and it is not uncommon for a person who is driving to a location for work purposes to cause a collision. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 7:57 am
In this case the Court noted that it was not uncommon for people to have access to the electronic transmission devices of others. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 8:04 pm
That phraseology originated in the Supreme Court case of U.S. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 9:03 am
The trial court’s opinion in M.A.T. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 7:13 pm
So I was interested to see that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court rejected the make-whole doctrine in an insurance subrogation case, in Jones v. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 6:30 am
Even if or when this Court overturns Roe v. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 11:03 am
Article I, Section 2 of the Ohio Constitution (All political power is inherent in the people. [read post]
29 May 2022, 12:26 pm
People v. [read post]
6 May 2020, 2:35 pm
Two things are virtually certain to be true about published decisions from the Appellate Division of the Superior Court. [read post]
30 May 2023, 10:37 am
The class action was initially certified at the Superior Court level, however the Province appealed to the Division Court. [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 9:13 am
People v. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 3:15 pm
The case will now return to the Superior Court for a new trial. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 10:00 am
Superior Court (1970) 2 Cal.3d 161, 169-170 (pdf).) [read post]
