Search for: "People v. Superior Court (Tony S.)" Results 1 - 20 of 40
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2010, 6:54 am by Tony Infanti
Ct. 1992), the court held that other peoples reactions to a mother’s lesbian relationship could not, alone, serve as a basis for restricting her custody. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 8:17 am by Kelsey Clinton
Finally, the defendants argue that under the Supreme Courts reasoning in Jesner v. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
The Court of Appeals also noted that the cited case had been appealed to the Maine Law Court, which did not follow the Superior Courts approach but decided the case on other grounds.The Court of Appeals concluded that Exemption F was ambiguous, even after taking account of interpretive aids, the law’s purpose, and the law’s legislative history. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
The Court of Appeals also noted that the cited case had been appealed to the Maine Law Court, which did not follow the Superior Courts approach but decided the case on other grounds.The Court of Appeals concluded that Exemption F was ambiguous, even after taking account of interpretive aids, the law’s purpose, and the law’s legislative history. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 7:24 am by Michael Crowell
Superior court judge Tony Brannon disagreed and sued when the State Board of Elections did not put Orr’s Court of Appeals seat on the ballot in 1992. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 6:31 am by Adam Chandler
” Commentary on the Courts opinion in United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
” This blog’s opinion analysis in Lamar, Archer & Cofrin, LLP v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 4:16 am by Maxwell Kennerly
So, Tony Stark gets to choose: disclose the details of the invention in a patent and correspondingly get superior civil (i.e. monetary) relief if someone copies it, or try to keep the invention secret himself and hope that criminal law dissuades people from stealing it. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 2:53 am by INFORRM
Statements in Open Court and Apologies On 18 July 2012 there was a Statement in Open Court [pdf] in the case of Gilligan v Faber & Faber, arising out of comments made in Ken Livingstone’s auto-biography. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 10:52 am
Mattel argued that the list of examples in the contract were illustrative not exclusive, but the Court held that "ideas" are "markedly different from the list of examples including discoveries, improvements and designs" (People ex rel Lungren v superior Court (1996)). [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 8:19 am by J. Gordon Hylton
In other words, Atlanta’s superior location provided greater opportunities both for live attendance and for the sale of increasingly important broadcasting rights. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Nonetheless, the Supreme Court has issued decisions making any such reforms difficult to adopt and enforce. [read post]
24 Jan 2009, 10:26 am
CornelioIn a January 7, 2009 decision of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in Cornelio v. [read post]
18 May 2023, 4:00 am by Brooke MacKenzie
Even if measures were taken immediately upon Carmela’s phone call, a court could not necessarily be confident that Tonys confidential information was not shared. [read post]