Search for: "People v. Superior Court (Wells)" Results 161 - 180 of 1,853
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2021, 7:22 am by Avery Welker
So far, in Property I, I have been learning that many people may be asserting a right to property, but the big question is finding out who has the superior right in a controversy. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 1:03 pm
Eli Lilly & Co., 3AN-06-05630 CI, Alaska Superior Court (Anchorage), have been limited but interesting thus far. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 11:40 am by Sabrina Serino
In particular the Court noted that: The employees’ duties, which include helping people make approximately 1.8 million journeys on the TTC’s system every day, as well as the TTC’s atypical workplace, which is “genuinely Toronto itself”, reasonably diminish the employees’ expectation of privacy concerning drug and alcohol consumption; The TTC has chosen minimally invasive methods to conduct the random testing, which are superior… [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 11:37 am by Sabrina Serino
In particular the Court noted that: The employees’ duties, which include helping people make approximately 1.8 million journeys on the TTC’s system every day, as well as the TTC’s atypical workplace, which is “genuinely Toronto itself”, reasonably diminish the employees’ expectation of privacy concerning drug and alcohol consumption; The TTC has chosen minimally invasive methods to conduct the random testing, which are superior… [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 12:02 pm
A little more than a year ago, back in February 2008, a majority of the Supreme Court stated, in Riegel v. [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 4:49 am
"Hmmmm.On the one hand, it seems fundamentally unfair to give rich people the superior ability to avoid an indictment and effectively negotiate a pre-charge plea deal while leaving poor people out in the cold. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 11:10 am by Jennifer Lynch
Earlier this summer, EFF filed an amicus brief in People v. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 4:21 pm by INFORRM
The recent judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Matúz v. [read post]