Search for: "People v. Sweeney"
Results 1 - 20
of 108
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jan 2024, 3:17 am
There is a presumption that judges serve with honesty and integrity. ( People v. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 4:45 am
Father Benedict Mawn v 89. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 11:19 am
A sample, from Washington v. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 11:55 am
Mann, against National Review magazine, the Competitive Enterprise Institute, and Mark Steyn.[1] Back in 2014, I commented upon the oddity of a scientist’s claim of defamation against lay people for criticizing a scientist’s work.[2] Mann took umbrage to statements, critical of his work that generated a “hockey-stick” model of global temperature rises. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 9:39 pm
Sweeney earlier this month. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 3:10 am
Not long after I finished reading, I felt eerily reminded of another antitrust complaint involving games, platforms (iOS), and even the subscription model (Apple Arcade): Pistacchio v. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 11:23 pm
In a little over a fortnight--on November 14--the Fortnite antitrust case, Epic Games v. [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 12:43 am
" It's a credibility problem, and while Epic v. [read post]
1 Oct 2022, 11:17 pm
However, most people don't visit a game's website if they're already playing the game. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 10:33 am
In reality, virtually 100% of all app developers who are aware of Epic Games v. [read post]
1 Sep 2022, 10:29 pm
If ACT had more talented people on board, they might be able to make a decent living without having to make such false claims. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
Our staff has published a “frequently asked questions” resource to demystify the rulemaking process and identify opportunities for the public to engage.22 We will also host a virtual public forum on September 8, where people will be able to provide oral remarks that will be part of the ANPR record.23 I am grateful to our agency staff for their work on this ANPR and my colleagues on the Commission for their engagement and input. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:05 pm
In Murphy v IRTC Barrington J gave two examples of the common good: the case concerned a ban on religious advertising in section 10(3) of the Radio and Television Act, 1988 (also here), and Barrington J (at [30]) held that the ban in section 10(3) could be justified either to prevent public unrest, or to ensure that, in matters of sensitivity, rich people “should not be able to buy access to the airwaves to the detriment of their poorer rivals”.… [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 8:52 pm
ACT (Association for Competitive Technology) became ACT | The App Association--and in such contexts as Philips v. [read post]
2 Jan 2022, 4:05 am
That was a clear allusion to FTC v. [read post]
22 Dec 2021, 10:52 pm
Sweeney draws attention to Apple's behavior and double standards. [read post]
24 Nov 2021, 6:30 am
As Sandy Levinson notes in his blog post, who “we” are as a people has a great deal to do with ancestry. [read post]
11 Sep 2021, 9:53 am
But I'm absolutely committed to telling people the truth.That article by The Verge (a website that actually did a great job covering the Epic Games v. [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 5:21 am
She was survived by Olga, Olga's daughter, Ann Sweeney, Michael, and another nephew, John David. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 2:36 am
Epic filed its private antitrust complaints in the Northern District of California that day.At the end of closing argument in Epic Games v. [read post]
