Search for: "People v. The Commissioners" Results 1 - 20 of 2,166
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2009, 2:02 am
Austin v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis House of Lords “Crowd control measures adopted by police in order to prevent a breach of public order, which resulted in several thousand people being confined within a police cordon for several hours, did not amount to a violation of the right to liberty if the measures were used [...] [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 2:09 am by traceydennis
Once the election commissioner had made a final order for costs and dealt with all aspects of the petiton under the Representation of the People Act 1983 he did not have the authority to re-open a decision as to costs and consider making an order against a third party. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 11:40 am by rtruman
Woman Says Sex-Change Tax Battle Was Victory for All Transgender People :: TaxProf Blog Summary :: O’Donnabhain v. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 6:00 am by Keith Paul Bishop
Yesterday, Commissioner Preston DuFauchard proposed further clarifications to the text of a proposed rule intended to respond to the California Court of Appeal’s decision in People v. [read post]
18 Apr 2015, 4:03 am by INFORRM
The area was considered by the First Tier Tribunal in Reactiv Media Limited v The Information Commissioner (Privacy & Electronic Communications Regulations  (2003) [2015] UKFTT 2014_0213 (GRC). [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 9:18 am by INFORRM
In the case of R (Catt) and R (T) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis ([2015] UKSC 9) a majority of the Supreme Court held that the retention by police of information on the Domestic Extremism Database about a 91 year-old activist’s presence at political protests was (1) in accordance with the law and (2) a proportionate interference with his right to a private life under Article 8(1) of the ECHR. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Spicer v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2019] EWHC 1439 (QB) Warby J held that an article’s headline, however defamatory, must be read in context, with the text of the article, in order to arrive at the natural and ordinary meaning. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 3:27 am by David Hart QC
Smartsource v Information Commissioner + 19 other parties [2010] UKUT 415 (AAC) 23rd November 2010 – read judgment Ibsen’s Enemy of the People has Dr Stockmann complaining to his Norwegian municipality about contamination of its water supply. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 11:43 pm by Mark Summerfield
In a development that should surprise nobody – least of all readers of this blog, where I have foreshadowed it twice – on 20 July 2020 the Commissioner of Patents filed an application for leave to appeal the decision in Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Limited v Commissioner of Patents [2020] FCA 778 to a Full Bench of the Federal Court of Australia. [read post]
25 Nov 2017, 4:10 pm by Mark Summerfield
If anyone thought that the decisions of the Full Federal Court of Australia in Research Affiliates LLC v Commissioner of Patents [2014] FCAFC 150 and Commissioner of Patents v RPL Central Pty Ltd [2015] FCAFC 177 would clarify the law relating to patent-eligibility of computer-implemented inventions (CIIs), resulting in greater certainty for patent applicants, then the evidence suggests that those people should be sorely disappointed. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 5:35 am by Inside Privacy
 The Commissioner-designate responded that “the reform pursues one important objective: to increase the trust of people” including in relation to online transactions. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 11:38 pm
Data Protection Commissioner (C.J.E.U.), with introductory note by Tobias J. [read post]