Search for: "People v. The Commissioners"
Results 181 - 200
of 2,333
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2012, 2:11 pm
Commissioner. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 7:17 am
Supreme Court finding in Graham v Florida that people can change, you’d think that agencies would recognize the same. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
My remarks today reflect my individual views as a Commissioner of the SEC and do not necessarily reflect the views of the full Commission or my fellow Commissioners. [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 8:14 am
The biggest news from today's Nokia v. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 1:00 pm
People v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 10:33 pm
Net disconnection requires involvement of judge, says Commissioner (LINK)Law firm interested in hearing from banned Xbox Live gamers (LINK)Why do people keep buying CDs? [read post]
Myong Nam Kim v. Board of Liquor License Commissioners for Baltimore City (Md. Ct. of Spec. Appeals)
3 Jan 2023, 6:00 am
” Second, it preserves the integrity of the governor’s veto power by preventing “a practice under which the legislature could include in a single act matters important to the people and desired by the Governor and other matters opposed by the Governor or harmful to the welfare of the state, with the result that in order to obtain the constructive or desired matter the Governor had to accept the unwanted portion. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 6:06 am
Lucia Companies, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 11:08 am
If Congress or the IRS wants to allow people to so easily avoid capital gains taxes, they're free to do so. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 3:13 pm
James V. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 3:00 am
Tomorrow morning, the House Financial Services Committee will hold an oversight hearing on the SEC in which all 5 SEC Commissioners will participate. [read post]
17 May 2012, 10:42 am
The benefits in that case were for people who were required to stop work because of injury. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 12:21 pm
Espinoza v. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 5:13 am
In so finding, the Supreme Court rejected the application to the 1972 Order of the “Carltona principle”, so named after the Court of Appeal judgment in Carltona Ltd v Commissioners of Works [1943] 2 All ER 560. [read post]
1 Feb 2020, 5:57 am
The arguments in favour of introducing the technology tended to focus on sound and practical considerations, such as the security and health and safety of staff and other users and income protection in that, by substituting the technology for people for particular tasks, those people could be used more effectively (for example, in that they are able to provide health and fitness advice, rather than being used to monitor who entered and left the facility). [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 7:25 pm
In Tipaldo v. [read post]
31 May 2014, 5:01 pm
V. [read post]
30 May 2014, 4:22 pm
V. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 2:28 pm
See Globe Newspaper Co. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 9:31 pm
Court" and then published this analysis: REST BREAK AND MEAL PERIOD CLAIMS AFTER MURPHY V. [read post]
