Search for: "People v. The Commissioners" Results 101 - 120 of 2,324
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by renholding
 This freedom to speak against the government and government officials is essential in a free society committed to the preeminence of the people. [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 7:10 am by Jonathan H. Adler
The rules say nothing about the status of votes by commissioners who have since departed, three of the people confirmed. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
Canada (Commissioner of Patents) 2014 FC 887, a case where four people worked together on the problem of pipes freezing without heat tracing products and produced a new type of heating cable they believed improved over existing products. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 6:13 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
" Notably, the quotes attributed to the commissioners -- particularly the second excerpt above -- do not explicitly say that the baker should lose because he has religious beliefs, that the religion has been used to horribly oppress people. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 1:55 am by CMS
In this post, Jack Prytherch, Of Counsel in the Tax Disputes & Investigations team at CMS, comments on the Supreme Court’s decision in HMRC v SSE Generation Ltd [2023] UKSC 17, which was handed down on 17 May 2023. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 6:27 am
Commissioner, Case Nos. 137400, 137407. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
In the case of David Miranda v Secretary of State for the Home Department, the Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis and three interveners ([2014] EWHC 255 (Admin)) the High Court rejected all the arguments supporting David Miranda’s application for judicial review of his detention at Heathrow Airport in August last year. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 2:13 pm by NARF
Commissioner of Internal Revenue (Indian Taxation) Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2021.html Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe v. [read post]
12 Oct 2013, 11:10 am
In the case at bar, the Family Court's determination that the child's best interests would be served by awarding sole custody to the father has a sound and substantial basis in the record as was held in analogous cases of Matter of Peoples v Bideau, Pierre–Paul v Boursiquot, Matter of Ramirez v Velez and Matter of Paul v Sawyer. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 12:25 pm by Unknown
Lake County Board of Commissioners (Trespassing; Sovereign Immunity) State Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2020.htmlTom v. [read post]