Search for: "People v. Thomas (1970)" Results 61 - 80 of 254
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
”[5][6] Justice Thomas’s plurality opinion in Mitchell v. [read post]
1 Apr 2007, 5:19 am
It would be a user right.Originality v. novelty - copyright and patent. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 1:27 pm by kwalters
” Justices Alito, Thomas, Gorsuch, and Kavanaugh also concluded that Louisiana’s law should stand precisely because it protected pregnant people against real dangers tied to abortion. [read post]
Some people are waving flags and watching the fireworks, proud of the America they think it is. [read post]
26 May 2020, 3:38 am by Edith Roberts
” At Jost on Justice, Kenneth Jost notes that in a recent documentary, “Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas recalls … that he viewed court-ordered busing in school desegregation cases in the 1970s as flawed and wrong-headed and still does”; Jost argues that “[a]s Supreme Court justice over the past 30 years, … Thomas has fallen victim to the same error: he has been single-mindedly committed to theories, original meaning and… [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
The reason I say Justice Thomas might be in play is that he might regard the case as an opportunity to strike a final death blow to the broadest interpretation of the tester-plaintiff case of Havens Realty Corp. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Ceballos, 547 U.S. 410 (2006), and Lane v. [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 9:48 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the April 14, April 22, April 29, May 12, May 19 and May 26 conferences) Thomas v. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 3:28 pm by Ilya Somin
Two of the justices in the Dobbs majority - Alito and Thomas - are well into their seventies. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 2:35 pm by James Fox
  Mary, like Deborah, reconceives the history from the 1970s-80s, but with a focus specifically on developments following Roe v. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 9:15 am by Eugene Volokh
Bresler (1970) (saying developer's position was "blackmail" was, in context, an opinion); Old Dominion Branch No. 496, Nat'l Ass'n of Letter Carriers v. [read post]