Search for: "People v. Thomas (1992)" Results 21 - 40 of 262
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Nov 2022, 9:07 am by Russell Knight
” In re Marriage of Thomas, 608 NE 2d 585 – Ill: Appellate Court, 3rd Dist. 1993 Court encourage full apportionment of a business in a divorce for the sake of “finality [and] to avoid continued need for court intervention…[.The] division of the property…avoid[s] ongoing association between the parties [and] are goals to be consider[ed] in apportioning such marital assets. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:23 am by Eugene Volokh
It is widely accepted that, consistent with the Dormant Commerce Clause, a firm doing multistate business must bear the cost of discovering and complying with state laws—tort laws, tax laws, franchise laws, health laws, privacy laws, and much more—everywhere it does business.[21] People and firms operating in "real space" must take steps to learn and comply with state law in places they visit or do business, or must avoid visiting or doing business in those… [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 10:44 am by Michael Oykhman
Although the rate of theft seemed to drop between 2019 and 2020 from 226,428 incidents in Canada to 180,504, this is largely thought to be due to the COVID-19 pandemic when more people were at home. 2021 numbers already indicate theft numbers are back on the rise and this is anticipated to also be reflected in 2022 statistics. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 4:18 pm by Legal Aggregate
The Second Amendment, Justice Clarence Thomas wrote for the majority, protects “an individual’s right to carry a handgun for self-defense outside the home. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 9:00 pm by Rodger Citron
Notably, in 1992, Blackmun dissented in part in Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
It was reaffirmed in 1992, in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 3:15 am by jonathanturley
Here is the column: In their historic ruling in Dobbs v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  To a political scientist, one way is by viewing it as a power play by the rabbinate, an attempt many centuries before the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Cooper v Aaron to engage in a performative utterance establishing themselves as the “ultimate interpreters” of the document in question, whether the Torah or the Constitution. [read post]
On the assumption that five Supreme Court Justices—Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett—are prepared to overrule Roe v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 7:33 am by Michael C. Dorf
Moreover, the oral argument last December strongly indicated that five Justices—Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett—were inclined to overrule Roe v. [read post]
2 May 2022, 7:09 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
The draft opinion is a full-throated, unflinching repudiation of the 1973 decision which guaranteed federal constitutional protections of abortion rights and a subsequent 1992 decision – Planned Parenthood v. [read post]