Search for: "People v. To" Results 1 - 20 of 72,155
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
  Between 2019-2023, travel to Oakland decreased by nearly 2 million people, which the OAK attributes to the Covid-19 pandemic. [read post]
5 May 2024, 12:05 pm by Ilya Somin
Legacy preferences are even less defensible than racial and ethnic preferences for historically disadvantaged groups, such as Black or Native American people. [read post]
5 May 2024, 4:13 am by SHG
The Supreme Court, in its recent Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
4 May 2024, 1:25 pm by David Bernstein
Even on school grounds, racist speech can be protected, such as Nazi meetings on school grounds, see National Socialist White People's Party v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 12:30 pm by John Ross
[Eagle-eyed readers might notice that the court cites Saunders v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Notwithstanding tobacco’s high death toll and damaging health effects, tobacco companies have survived hundreds of lawsuits challenging their promotion and distribution of a deadly drug, including Lorillard Tobacco Co. v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 12:00 am
Thousands of people driving while impaired on opioids or other narcotics are attracting the attention of law enforcement. [read post]
2 May 2024, 9:05 pm by Brian Connor
District Court for the District of Oregon to dismiss Juliana v. [read post]
2 May 2024, 3:23 pm
But the type of harshness you see here is not his usual forte.Four conduct has to really hack off the Court of Appeal to get an opinion like this one, and from a justice like this one, no less.Hopefully people will learn the underlying lesson. [read post]
2 May 2024, 1:03 pm
Justice Corrigan authors a powerful opinion that holds that it's not permissible for the police to conduct a Terry stop just because someone's in a high crime area and pretending to tie his shoe behind a car in order to avoid the police, and Justice Evan authors an equally powerful concurrence (joined by a majority of the Court) that highlights the racial implications of a rule that assumes that the "normal" response to a police encounter is to welcome and/or consent to… [read post]