Search for: "People v. Tran (1996)" Results 1 - 20 of 52
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2008, 5:26 pm
However, as has already been much discussed in this blog, in Heller v. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 11:44 am
For this Naughty Step, we’re going trans-atlantic. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 4:30 am by Sherry F. Colb
If the ERA said explicitly that women (and trans men and nonbinary people) have a right against forced pregnancy and birth, then the ERA would be the perfect response to the 70-page sick bag that Sam Alito (SA) just handed to half the population. [read post]
20 May 2024, 5:01 am by Doriane Coleman
This was already the question in 1996 when [Ruth Bader] Ginsburg penned the majority opinion in United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 2:54 pm
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]
9 Feb 2020, 7:17 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
In Raincoast Conservation Foundation v. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 10:16 am
Your marketing people talk to the docs. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 8:35 am
The state is constituted by the union of people and government, and it is the state that claims against all other states the twin rights of territorial integrity and political sovereignty. . . . [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 7:33 am
, 2013; see also Amatucci, 2015, 105 [“une tendance, tant dans l'ordre juridique américain qu'italien, en faveur du déplacement du barycentre des fonctions de l'organe d'administration vers la surveillance, envisagée dans le sens que nous avons présenté” (trans:) “a trend, both in the American and Italian legal order, in favour of moving the barycenter of the functions of the administrative body toward… [read post]