Search for: "People v. Union Oil Co." Results 21 - 40 of 84
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2019, 3:55 pm by Joy Waltemath
Edmondson Oil Co., Inc., as a strong signal that it intended to recognize a good-faith defense in § 1983 actions when the defendant reasonably relies on established law. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 7:20 pm by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Inside, the building is marble, marble, marble, with hallways and staircases that seem to stretch for miles, oil portraits and busts of old justices. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
 She has authored and co-authored numerous books including the How to Understand Statutes and Regulations, Annotated Federal Interpretation Act, The Practical Guide to Canadian Legal Research, Introduction to the Law and Legal System of Canada, and Updating Statutes and Regulations for all Canadian Jurisdictions. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 9:30 pm by Bobby Chen
The supporting briefs for both sides in Trump v. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 10:48 pm by GJEL
A Minnesota labor union health care fund and individual consumers from around the US led the case against Takeda. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm by Edith Roberts
The district court had held that “Union Pacific violated Title VII, as amended by the PDA, because ‘it treats medical care women need to prevent pregnancy less favorably than it treats medical care needed t [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 2:45 pm by Michael Grossman
A natural component of crude oil, benzene is an organic chemical compound, classified as an “aromatic hydrocarbon. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 4:00 am by Jessica Clogg
Conditionally approved by federal Cabinet in June 2014, the project was the subject of a barrage of legal challenges brought by eight First Nations (including two co-represented by West Coast and Mandell Pinder LLP), four environmental groups, as well as Canada’s largest private sector union (which represents both oil sands and fisheries workers impacted by the project). [read post]
  In these joined cases, the Court took the opportunity to re-write the penalties doctrine, which had not been considered by the House of Lords or Supreme Court since the 1914 case of Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co Ltd v New Garage & Motor Co Ltd [1914] UKHL 1. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 8:51 am by WIMS
 Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Maple Drive Farms v. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 9:30 am
Gerber Products Co., 2014 WL 2860995, at *10 (N.D. [read post]