Search for: "People v. Urban" Results 1 - 20 of 949
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2014, 9:34 pm by Ezra Rosser
This essay revisits the “people v. places” debate in light of GREAT AMERICAN CITY. [read post]
Here, Pamela did not want to partner up with Urban Outfitters and the designer now has the protection of federal copyright to strengthen her claim against Urban Outfitters. ( read the complaint at below) Pamela Love v Urban Outfitters Copyright Infringement A [read post]
7 Oct 2024, 5:00 am by Tessa Shepperson
The main case on this point is the House of Lords decision in Street v. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 4:40 pm
Because even if you go to Urban Dictionary or google the term "nose dipping," you'll still have utterly no clue as to what that phrase could possibly mean. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 12:06 pm
Co., 274 AD2d 346 [1st Dept 2000]; Yankelevitz v Royal Globe Ins. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 9:50 pm
The occasion was another season final: Lakers v. 76ers, June 2001. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 5:31 am
The FREE PEOPLE mark had been used by Urban Outfitters since 1970. [read post]
3 Nov 2018, 6:11 am by Mark S. Humphreys
  Areas that are rural are usually more inclined to have people who own animals of one type or another. [read post]