Search for: "People v. Valdez (1994)"
Results 1 - 12
of 12
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
The statute covers a very wide variety of federal officers and people acting under the direction of federal officers–including elected officials, federal civil employees, federal law enforcement officers, judges, postal workers, military officers, and more. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 11:51 am
Thirty-four people, all of whom were sleeping below deck, died as a result. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am
In Francis v. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 3:57 pm
Standard of Review and Applicable LawThe test for legal sufficiency is "whether the evidence at trial would enable reasonable and fair-minded people to reach the verdict under review. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 10:18 pm
In 1968 Gonzáles led a Chicano contingent in the Poor People’s March on Washington, D.C. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 3:21 pm
In 1968 Gonzáles led a Chicano contingent in the Poor People’s March on Washington, D.C. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 6:05 pm
The suggestiveness of pretrial procedures is determined by examination of the totality of the circumstances (People v Valdez, 204 AD2d 369 [2nd Dept 1994]). [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 2:35 pm
Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:34 pm
Co. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
Williams, we posted that the writing was clearly on the wall to the effect that punitive damages had "peaked out" in American law.That conclusion was strongly supported in the US Supreme Court's recent decision in the Exxon Valdez punitive damages case, Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
