Search for: "People v. Wagner" Results 1 - 20 of 305
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Aug 2016, 12:20 pm
 Wagner files his own supplemental brief.The Court of Appeal then reverses, finding that there was indeed jurisdiction to consider the motion.So apparently there was a non-frivolous argument to be made. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 4:02 pm by admin
Frank Wagner, the longest-serving and most prolific Reporter of Decisions for the Supreme Court of the United States, passed away unexpectedly on August 28. [read post]
15 Sep 2018, 3:45 am by INFORRM
It was a most disastrous event, the flood  rising to 5 metres and resulting in twelve people losing their lives including young children. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 12:44 pm by David Zaring
 Next week, Congress will be voting on whether to change the US's first-to-invent rule to match the rest of the world's first-to-file rule, and my colleagues on the other side of the unversity, David Abrams and Polk Wagner, have done a study on whether the change would be a good idea. [read post]
The case that was previously posted on and that is currently under review by the California Supreme Court is People v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 6:06 am by INFORRM
He began by describing modern democratic government as: “government of the people by the people for the people. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 4:00 am by Alice Woolley
Justice Wagner denied intervenor status to 17 groups. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 3:29 pm by Michel-Adrien Sheppard
The first such Case in Brief will be made available tomorrow at noon in the case of Carson v. [read post]
3 May 2013, 9:50 am by JB
  But the federal common law that people fight about today normally displaces state law to the contrary. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 10:17 am
In such circumstances, the court’s intervention is justified because the sentencing judge decided on the fitness of the sentence without considering a relevant factor,” Wagner wrote in Pham v. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 3:36 pm by Michel-Adrien
Because many people are involved, we have been developing the process over the last few months to find the best method and format. [read post]
2 May 2019, 3:10 pm by Heather Donkers
Heather’s Legal Summaries: R v Trinchi, 2019 ONCA 356 R v Trinchi is the most recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision in a string of cases related to the offence of voyeurism under s. 162(1) of the Criminal Code (see our previous post on the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in R v Jarvis). [read post]
2 May 2019, 3:10 pm by Heather Donkers
Heather’s Legal Summaries: R v Trinchi, 2019 ONCA 356 R v Trinchi is the most recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision in a string of cases related to the offence of voyeurism under s. 162(1) of the Criminal Code (see our previous post on the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in R v Jarvis). [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 3:30 am by Steve Baird
Our mission is to create dynamic and significant Daymaking experiences that positively impact people, society and the world at large. [read post]