Search for: "People v. Walker (1988)"
Results 41 - 60
of 62
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2013, 9:19 am
Mr Arden [QC for Camden] referred also to the decision of the House of Lords in Uratemp Ventures Ltd v Collins [2002] AC 301, relating to the definition of “a dwelling-house let as a separate dwelling” in section 1 of the Housing Act 1988. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 4:01 am
Lewy v. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 9:47 am
handle=hein.journals/usflr29&collection=journals&id=661 "Martin Luther King, Walker v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 3:08 pm
Cole v. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 2:09 am
“Help me, Lord Walker! [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 2:24 pm
Yet, in People v Walker (4th Dept 9/30/11)) the Court held that a trial courtdid not err in refusing defendant’s request to allow defendant to present the testimony of a false confessions expert. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 2:24 pm
Yet, in People v Walker (4th Dept 9/30/11)) the Court held that a trial courtdid not err in refusing defendant’s request to allow defendant to present the testimony of a false confessions expert. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 10:48 am
Housing Authority (1988) 200 Cal.App.3d 635 (Hanif),[1] Hamilton argued that because only the amounts paid by plaintiff and her insurer could be recovered, the larger amounts billed by the providers were irrelevant and should be excluded. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
App. 2005); Walker v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:44 am
The appellants accordingly applied for compensation under the statutory scheme established by the CJA 1988. [read post]
9 Apr 2011, 3:48 pm
I Between 1988 and 1989, respondent Francisco Espinosa obtained four federally guaranteed student loans for a total principal amount of $13,250. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 1:49 pm
Sept. 13, 2010); Walker v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 3:52 am
The leading case on the issue is the House of Lords judgment in the 2004 case of R v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:37 pm
The field is situated immediately adjacent to the Trout Run Trail, an eight-mile public trail for bicyclists, walkers and runners that circles the city of Decorah. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 1:34 am
ANA SILVA YANEZ, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am
However, in Knowsley v White, Lord Neuberger had taken the view, albeit obiter, that it was entirely possible for an alternative interpretation of s.82(2) to be made, such that the date the tenancy ended was the date 'on which the tenant was to give up possession', i.e. on enforcement, bringing it into line with the interpretation of Housing Act 1988 for assured tenants in that case. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am
However, in Knowsley v White, Lord Neuberger had taken the view, albeit obiter, that it was entirely possible for an alternative interpretation of s.82(2) to be made, such that the date the tenancy ended was the date 'on which the tenant was to give up possession', i.e. on enforcement, bringing it into line with the interpretation of Housing Act 1988 for assured tenants in that case. [read post]
14 Dec 2008, 12:02 pm
Commonwealth v. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 12:36 pm
App. 2000); Walker v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 4:52 pm
Pappas (1988) 203 Cal.App.3d 201, 208, italics added.) [read post]
