Search for: "People v. Wardlow" Results 1 - 20 of 29
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2023, 8:10 am by Michael C. Dorf
Wardlow, 528 U.S. 119 (2000)), and the Roberts court turned a blind eye, more recently, to racialized policing on the ground and the over-policing of certain communities by permitting searches to be excused even if they were completely unlawful (e.g., in Utah v. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
Briefly: At The Texas Tribune, Jolie McCullough reports that “Texas executed Billy Joe Wardlow on Wednesday night for a 1993 East Texas robbery and murder”; “[n]euroscientists and a group of Texas lawmakers [had] raised concerns with sentencing people who had committed crimes under 21 to death because of brain immaturity,” but “[a]ll of Wardlow’s appeals were denied by the U.S. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:43 am by Amy Howe
Commentary on Horne v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 4:37 am by SHG
The law, on the other hand, sees flight as a significant factor: In a 2000 case from Chicago, Illinois v. [read post]
2 May 2015, 4:11 am by SHG
Wardlow, where Chief Justice Rehnquist offered this bit of sophistry: Such a holding is entirely consistent with our decision in Florida v. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 9:55 pm by Jeff Gamso
 And so, on January 29, exactly two weeks later,   Baca v. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm by Stephen Bilkis
More recently, in Illinois v Wardlow (2000), the Supreme Court found that an individual's presence next to a building in a high crime area, holding an opaque bag, together with his unprovoked flight on seeing the police, who were converging on the area as part of a drug crime investigation, did, in fact, furnish a reasonable suspicion that drug crime was afoot and therefore provided justification to chase him. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm by Stephen Bilkis
More recently, in Illinois v Wardlow (2000), the Supreme Court found that an individual's presence next to a building in a high crime area, holding an opaque bag, together with his unprovoked flight on seeing the police, who were converging on the area as part of a drug crime investigation, did, in fact, furnish a reasonable suspicion that drug crime was afoot and therefore provided justification to chase him. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 7:28 am by Christa Culver
Wardlow (2000), holding that unprovoked flight from the police may constitute reasonable suspicion justifying a brief investigative detention under Terry v. [read post]