Search for: "People v. Weinstein"
Results 1 - 20
of 207
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2024, 10:28 am
Over lunch, Egilman explained to me that he considered himself a Marxist-Leninist, his term, and that the day would come when people like him would have to kill people like me, again his language. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
That's why cases like South Dakota v. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am
As a committed socialist, Egilman was incurious about how and why occupational and environmental diseases were so prevalent in socialist and communist countries, where profits are outlawed and the people own the means of production.[2] Like the radical labor historians David Rosner and Gerald Markowitz, Egilman tried to cram the history of silicosis (and even silicosis litigation) into a Marxist narrative of class conflict, economic reductionism, and capitalist greed. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 3:35 am
Nor may the prosecution use “prior convictions or proof of the prior commission of specific, criminal, vicious or immoral acts” other than to impeach the accused’s credibility (People v Sandoval, 34 NY2d 371 , 374 [ 1974]). [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
Despite their obvious intelligence, capacity for affection, when it comes to toxicology, dogs are not people, although some people act like the less reputable varieties of dogs. [read post]
29 Oct 2023, 11:26 am
See Ben Ezra, Weinstein, & Co., Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 12:42 pm
A little censorship leads people to watch what they say. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 7:09 pm
Part V concludes with a report card on how the regime is doing on its thirtieth anniversary. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 5:50 am
(Editor’s Note: The authors share their insights on U.S. government classification and declassification process on the Just Security Podcast. [read post]
25 May 2023, 10:14 am
" In Sealed Plaintiff v. [read post]
8 May 2023, 6:30 am
Morrison and the states in Castle Rock v. [read post]
1 May 2023, 9:01 pm
Public Interest Defense The law of confidentiality is based on the principle that people who are entrusted with confidential information ought, as a general rule, to respect it. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 3:48 am
This was applied by Justice Mark Dwyer in People v. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
In doing so, he actually hurt many people. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 3:00 am
The Associated Press reports here that the lower courts are struggling to apply New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 2:57 pm
From the WIPO Arbitration & Mediation Center Administrative Panel Decision in Polanski v. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 5:45 am
’” Even though the Norton v. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 4:43 am
Under New York law, this is set forth in a 1901 decision, People v. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
Prior to 2012, when the Supreme Court decided United States v. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 5:31 am
Term Limits, Inc. v. [read post]
