Search for: "People v. Wells (1983)" Results 61 - 80 of 996
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2016, 12:55 pm by Michael Grossman
The doctors’ compliance with these repeated procedures seems a little suspect as well. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 3:54 am by Kirsten Sjvoll, Matrix Chambers
It is established in Strasbourg and domestic jurisprudence that in certain “well-defined circumstances” art 2 will impose “a positive obligation on [state] authorities to take preventative operational measure” to protect the life of an individual (Osman v UK (2009) 29 EHRR 245 at 115). [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 4:49 am by Bernard Bell
 Between August 2016 and January 2017, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 9:50 pm
The fourth amendment protects people from unreasonable seizures as well as unreasonable searches, United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by Eric Berger
Ward dissent, which ignored the bright line between habeas and 42 U.S.C. sec. 1983 that Scalia himself had drawn in Heck v. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 6:30 am
He tries to reassure those people that they `are not in trouble’ and that, even though medical treatment is expensive, their immediate health is more important than the cost. [read post]