Search for: "People v. White (1970)" Results 21 - 40 of 368
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Oct 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
It has sprung instead from the dominant fears of white political leaders in the South, ardent segregationists and white supremacists who wanted to minimize the impact of black voting and political influence. [read post]
21 Jan 2018, 5:02 am by Tom Smith
The older pro-life leaders of today are the pioneering young adult activists of the 1970s, who courageously dissented from Roe v. [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 11:00 pm
Can’t have a judge do that y’all.In 1966 in White v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 12:30 pm
People of color, people struggling financially, and young people will be disproportionately affected. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 11:14 am
(The Court argued that the law treated both blacks and whites alike, so there was no race discrimination. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 7:15 am by Tomiko Brown-Nagin
Here's an excerpt from Coates's thoughtful commentary:The message has long been clear: the Civil War is a story for white people—acted out by white people, on white people’s terms—in which blacks feature strictly as stock characters and props. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 7:15 am by Tomiko Brown-Nagin
Here's an excerpt from Coates's thoughtful commentary:The message has long been clear: the Civil War is a story for white people—acted out by white people, on white people’s terms—in which blacks feature strictly as stock characters and props. [read post]
14 May 2007, 8:10 pm
  That is, in Loving, both white people and people of color were prohibited from marrying members of the other group, but the Supreme Court saw through the fake equality. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 4:35 pm
No State could have anticipated this bait-and-switch when the Clean Air Act was enacted in 1970 or last revised in 1990. [read post]
11 Jan 2007, 6:19 am
"The American people have no reason in the world to think it's going to work just like the president paints it," said one of those backers, Senator Pete V. [read post]