Search for: "People v. White (1981)" Results 81 - 100 of 215
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Dec 2020, 6:29 pm by James Romoser
He sat down in the section reserved for white people, because the Black section was crowded and had water on the floor. [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 3:12 pm by James Romoser
And in 1981, she wrote one of the first law-review articles on domestic violence. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 4:00 am
Keep in mind that Maryland has a particularly long and deep  history of racism and segregation, thus having enabled juries all the more under Article 23 to convict based on  non-white status alone and to acquit white people who committed crimes against non-white people. [read post]
26 Jul 2020, 9:07 pm by Michael C. Harper
The plaintiff brought the complaint under Section 1981 of the Civil Rights Act of 1866, which guarantees “all persons … the same right … to make and enforce contracts … as is enjoyed by white citizens. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 12:44 pm by Donna
§ 1981(a post-Civil War race discrimination statute) prohibits retaliation. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 6:10 am by Heidi Henson
A group of 14 employees initially filed a class action suit under Section 1981 in October 2008 (Brown v Yellow Transp, Inc, No 08 CV 5908). [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
 A warning about an inherent risk – a so-called “risk warning” – serves an entirely different purpose.With inherent risks, people are warned so they can decide whether that risk outweighs the benefits that might be gained from using the product. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 9:02 pm by Anita Ramasastry
  Whether you hire black or white people to date each other on reality television, they argued, is not a creative, but purely a contractual, decision. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
Hanson-Young v Leyonhjelm (No 4) [2019] FCA 1981 White J found that the plaintiff, a Green Senator, had been defamed by a former political opponent who had accused her of being a misandrist and a hypocrite. [read post]
25 May 2012, 12:05 am by Ken
White, 7 F.3d 527, 528-29 (6th Cir. 1993). [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 8:46 am
Arizona, 451 U.S. 477 (1981), did not have a substantial and injurious effect on the jury verdict. [read post]