Search for: "People v. White (1981)" Results 101 - 120 of 214
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2016, 2:06 pm by Giles Peaker
Ms J had been a Southwark tenant since 1981 and paid the water rate to Southwark with her rent, as do some 37,000 tenants of unmetered Southwark properties. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 6:05 am by Joy Waltemath
Thus, two people who both appear to be “white” and would both identify as “white” on a Census form may nonetheless belong to different “races” for purposes of Section 1981. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 4:00 am by Gary P. Rodrigues
Sharpe and Patricia McMahon Misconceptions: Unmarried Motherhood and the Children of Unmarried Parents Act by Lori Chambers The Alberta Supreme Court at 100: History & Authority edited by Jonathan Swainger My Life in Crime and Other Academic Adventures by Martin Friedland 2006 Magistrates, Police & People: Everyday Criminal Justice in Quebec and Lower Canada, 1764-1837 by Donald Fyson The Court of Queen’s Bench of Manitoba 1870- 1950: A Biographical History by Dale Brawn… [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 6:31 am by Joy Waltemath
He also claimed a white employee referred to them with a racial slur and that he and his African-American coworkers were terminated. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 3:08 pm by Carl Vennitti
Prior to July of 2003, V&V Enterprises, Inc., did business as Mauro Brand Products and been marketing and selling “pocket sandwiches” since coming under inspection by the USDA in 1991. [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 8:41 am by Bill Otis
McHugh is a "friend of white supremacists" is true, but nothing in her questions to me gave me any reason to believe she is a racist. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 6:57 am by Joy Waltemath
Both African-American employees sued, alleging that the hospital and its subsidiaries discriminated against them in violation of Sec. 1981 and Title VII; one of the employees also claimed retaliation. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 9:11 am by Jerry Kalish
The letter included a draft of a white paper written by Ayres and Prof. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
  In Mills, the plaintiff claimed that, due to a variant gene (“CYP”), she could not metabolize the defendant’s drug as well as most other people. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 1:29 am by Graham Smith
” (emphasis added)We do not know what proportion of initial leads are false positives, casting suspicion on blameless people. [read post]