Search for: "People v. White (1987)" Results 61 - 80 of 247
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Nov 2015, 6:41 am
SPI's administrative office was a converted, two-story white house. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 1:09 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
She at first said a long-haired white man was the perpetrator before identifying a short-haired Hispanic man (Mr. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 3:28 pm by NL
The period addressed the dip between a new road opening and ‘people getting used to it’.The Court of Appeal held that:The general purpose of these provisions is, as the 1972 White Paper made clear, to strike a balance between public and private interests. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 3:28 pm by NL
The period addressed the dip between a new road opening and ‘people getting used to it’.The Court of Appeal held that:The general purpose of these provisions is, as the 1972 White Paper made clear, to strike a balance between public and private interests. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 6:29 am
Quite a fact pattern here: Constellation Brands, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
That got pushed back to 1987, the bicentennial of the Constitution, and then to 1991, the bicentennial of the Bill of Rights. [read post]
4 Apr 2015, 4:00 pm by Stephen Bilkis
See also United States v Mojica, 62 AD3d 100, 110 (2d Dept) ("the defendant may not assert a due process challenge contending that the statute is vague as applied to the conduct of others (see Broadrick v Oklahoma, 413 US 601, 608 [1973]; People v Shack, 86 NY2d 529, 538 [1995]; People v Nelson, 69 NY2d 302, 308 [1987]. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 5:53 am by Dan Carvajal
Laws by their very nature divide people into different categories and subject them to differing treatment, but not all laws violate the Equal Protection Clause. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 1:02 pm by Alison Siegler
In 1987, the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of jailing federal defendants before trial in United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2022, 4:04 am by Russell Knight
A divorce case unwinds the matters of two people who were together for years. [read post]