Search for: "People v. Wiggins" Results 61 - 76 of 76
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2018, 6:41 am by John Elwood
Ohio, 17-7233, both were convicted of killing people in botched robberies. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am by John Elwood
But it seems to me that people are overlooking the obvious answer: While many people were hoping and praying during the bleak dull days of October Term 2016 that the Supreme Court would finally get some interesting cases, nobody thought to wish that the court would ever actually decide them. [read post]
Of the seven Justices on the Court, Justices Wiggins and Hecht did not participate in the decision. [read post]
Of the seven Justices on the Court, Justices Wiggins and Hecht did not participate in the decision. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:15 am by Steve Lombardi
Very few people would disagree that a valid reason for awarding punitive damages is to compensate the injured person for the indignity of the perpetrator’s act and that is reason enough to allow the claim to proceed against the estate. [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 1:24 am
Bukowski of Stevens & Lee, were just doing their job as they represented Capital Blue Cross in Grider v. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 4:58 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Langer, Wiggin and Dana LLP, Hartford, CT To get AG attention, get an editorial about the practice in the NYT! [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 8:29 am by Justin Walsh
This is how we go about picking our candidates for office, and we hope that you join us in voting for the people that follow on this list. [read post]