Search for: "People v. Wilds" Results 41 - 60 of 826
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2023, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
The objectively ascertainable personal injury caused by an assault bears no relation to a human evaluating and reacting to what people say and write. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 7:35 am by Cyberleagle
The objectively ascertainable personal injury caused by an assault bears no relation to a human evaluating and reacting to what people say and write. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Our detection and response efforts have evolved over time in response to real cases of misuse encountered "in the wild" that didn't feature as prominently as influence operations in our initial risk assessments. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 11:55 am by admin
Mann, against National Review magazine, the Competitive Enterprise Institute, and Mark Steyn.[1] Back in 2014, I commented upon the oddity of a scientist’s claim of defamation against lay people for criticizing a scientist’s work.[2] Mann took umbrage to statements, critical of his work that generated a “hockey-stick” model of global temperature rises. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 5:21 pm by INFORRM
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently issued an opinion in Pino v Cardone Capital, LLC that followed the Eleventh Circuit ruling in Wildes v BitConnect, finding that if a person promotes the sale of a security on social media, that person may qualify as a “seller” under Section 12 of the Security Act of 1933. [read post]
In most legal orgs, this percentage is near negligible, especially if the org is being honest with itself about (i) how many personnel in putative innovation roles (legal operations, knowledge management, project management) are consumed by active matters, existing programs, and administration, (ii) how much technology spend is maintenance, and (iii) how many projects are purely aspirational with no real resources save the illusory spare hours of already busy people. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 1:00 am by David Pocklington
  “Loose Canon”: This is the name given to “The scriptures of the “Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster”, De Wilde v The Netherlands [2021] ECHR No 9476/19 at 25; it is also the column in The Guardian written by The Revd Giles Fraser; and is the Loose Cannon Brewery in Abingdon, Oxon. 5. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 6:55 am by Eric Goldman
by Kieran McCarthy [Eric’s note: this is the second of a two-part series on the denouement of the hiQ v. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 7:44 am by Matthew Benedict
People v Bailey, 330 Mich App 41, 944 NW2d 370 (2019). [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 12:30 pm by John Ross
So writes The Onion in an amicus brief urging the Supreme Court to take up Novak v. [read post]