Search for: "People v. Williams (1973)" Results 41 - 60 of 208
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2023, 9:45 am by Eugene Volokh
Williams, 553 U.S. 285 (2008), builds on this principle: "Offers to engage in illegal transactions are categorically excluded from First Amendment protection," id. at 297 (citing Giboney v. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
Williams, we posted that the writing was clearly on the wall to the effect that punitive damages had "peaked out" in American law.That conclusion was strongly supported in the US Supreme Court's recent decision in the Exxon Valdez punitive damages case, Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 8:05 am by Greg Guedel
Tribal leaders say that as many as 75 people were killed on Pine Ridge during a three-year period of internecine violence that followed the 71-day Wounded Knee standoff with federal troops in 1973, a time that came to be known on the reservation as the "reign of terror. [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 3:12 pm by James Romoser
In 1973, Beckwith was a recent graduate of law school and was working as a political reporter for TIME magazine. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:41 am by CMS
The case of King v Victor Parsons & Co [1973] 1 WLR 29 examined the situation where a person acted recklessly “like the man who turns a blind eye” determining that a person who “refrained from further inquiry lest awareness of a risk should prove to be correct, was said to be in the same position as a person who acted knowingly”. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 11:50 am by William Eskridge - Guest
Wade (1973), which recognized too broad a constitutional right, and the Charybdis of Bowers v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 11:02 am by msatta
Having recently marked the forty-fifth anniversary of the Court’s 1973 decision in Roe v. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
It was decided in 1973, so it has been on the books for a long time. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 7:50 am by Eugene Volokh
California, 413 U.S. 15 (1973) (upholding criminalization of obscenity); Smith v. [read post]