Search for: "People v. Williams (1989)" Results 1 - 20 of 283
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2014, 7:30 am by Clark
1989: wikipedia.org Texas v. [read post]
  Williams v The London Borough of Hackney [2018] UKSC 37 was about the opposite scenario; where a local authority wanted to accommodate but the parents wanted the children back. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 10:19 am by Brian Shiffrin
Previously, the Court held that where, as here, a prosecutor seeks testimony that the defendant’s version of events was not believable, the witness’s  “. . . testimony is equivalent to an opinion that the defendant is guilty, and the receipt of such testimony may not be condoned (People v Williams, 6 NY2d 18, 23 [1959]; People v Higgins, 5 NY2d 607, 627-628 [1959]; People v Gradon, 43 AD2d 842 [2d Dept 1984]). [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 2:13 am by Scott Bomboy
” The Court moved toward its historic 1989 decision about flag burning in 1974, when it said in Spence v. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 1:07 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  From the First Amendment side, we have Reed v. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 2:25 pm by Reference Staff
Army, 875 F.2d 699 (1989) (requiring the Army to reenlist Perry Watkins, an admitted homosexual) and Snetsinger v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
Louis, IM & SR v Williams.3 Tenenbaum had argued that the court should follow the standard set out by the Supreme Court in punitive damages cases, specifically BMW v Gore,4 a far less deferential standard. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 7:20 pm
Williams, which involves a $79.5 million punitive damage award against the tobacco giant Philip Morris. [read post]