Search for: "People v. Witt"
Results 1 - 20
of 271
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2023, 5:52 am
Denezpi v. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 12:08 am
Most French people seem to support the ban. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 3:51 am
In Chewy v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 4:00 am
A Dailge & Daniel V. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 9:30 pm
ICYMI: R v Penguin Books Ltd: When Lady Chatterley’s Lover was Put on Trial (The Collector). [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 5:16 am
The plaintiff in Gonzalez v. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 11:57 am
District Court judge authorizing the use of a geofence warrant in the Jan. 6 prosecution case United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 2:09 pm
Benjamin Wittes sat down with Scott R. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 5:01 am
From People v. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 6:30 am
In addition, Wilson was one of the main authors of the 1790 Pennsylvania constitution—another surprisingly neglected fact about him, which bears on Moore v. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 5:01 am
We have Roger Parloff on the Jan. 6 criminal prosecutions, Quinta Jurecic and Molly Reynolds on the Jan. 6 Committee, Tyler McBrien on climate security, Benjamin Wittes on the Mar-a-Lago investigation, Scott R. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 10:51 am
Benjamin Wittes sat down with Roger Parloff to discuss the Oath Keeper trial now that the case has gone to the jury. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 2:15 pm
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit’s ruling on content moderation in NetChoice v. [read post]
13 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
Brown, Alex Engler, and Henry Claypool to discuss how people with disabilities are impacted by current technology and legislation on this issue: Loren DeJonge Schulman discussed Schedule F, a Trump administration federal workforce policy, and its potential implications on national security. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 1:26 pm
A Russian missile strike killed at least 13 people and injured 11 others in southern Ukraine. [read post]
23 Jul 2022, 9:51 am
Jurecic and Orpett, in conversation with Wittes, argued that the Justice Department is too narrowly conceptualizing its responsibilities and, as such, is failing to do enough to investigate the Jan. 6 attack. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 12:57 pm
ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Adam Chan discussed the implications of the Supreme Court’s ruling in Torres v. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
In 1873, in Bradwell v. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 3:22 pm
ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Peter Margulies explained the Supreme Court’s decision in Biden v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 2:24 pm
Bruen, and the tech privacy implications of Dobbs v. [read post]
