Search for: "People v. Young (1985)" Results 1 - 20 of 165
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Dec 2011, 7:05 am by Jeanne Long
 In one of those three, People v. [read post]
1 May 2018, 2:25 pm
His mother too started physically abusing him at a young age. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 4:10 pm
  The responsibility of the state to provide exculpatory evidence to the defense was articulated in the 1963 Supreme Court ruling in Brady v. [read post]
The result of this invidious doctrine, as formulated in Chan Wing-Siu v The Queen [1985] 1 AC 168, meant that “if two people set out to commit an offence (crime A), and in the course of that joint enterprise, one of them (D1) commits another offence (crime B), the second person (D2) is guilty as an accessory to crime B if he has foreseen the possibility that D1 might act as he did. [read post]
23 May 2021, 4:01 am by Administrator
Criminal Law: Sexual Assault by Young Person; Appeals as of RightR. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
The Defendant appears to believe that this lawsuit constitutes an "abuse of process" because it is part of a wider campaign targeting file-sharing activities, one which has swept up large numbers of young people accused of downloading and distributing copyrighted works, many of whom cannot afford counsel. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 1:10 pm by Mark Ashton
Here the published decision relies on a 1985 Superior Court case; Commonwealth ex rel McNutt v. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 4:00 am by Administrator
Parliament’s allocation of responsibility to adults is crucial for protecting young people from sexual crimes. [read post]