Search for: "Peoples v. Lafler"
Results 1 - 20
of 35
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Nov 2011, 7:35 am
LAFLER v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 5:42 pm
Cooper and Missouri v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 5:27 pm
On Wednesday, January 12, 2011, the Michigan Supreme Court denied one application for leave to appeal and held the case of People v. [read post]
13 Jul 2013, 11:43 pm
Supreme Court in the 2012 decisions Lafler v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 4:59 am
Frye and Lafler v. [read post]
24 May 2012, 9:43 am
Frye, 132 S.Ct. 1399 (2012) and Lafler v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 8:46 am
As a further explanation of an earlier post, the Supreme Court recently published opinions in two important cases, Lafler v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 8:46 am
As a further explanation of an earlier post, the Supreme Court recently published opinions in two important cases, Lafler v. [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 12:26 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Lafler v. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 5:01 am
The Supreme Court published opinions in two important cases this week, LAFLER v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 11:52 am
In an American Constitution Society video webinar on her experience litigating Lafler v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 7:26 am
Coverage of Monday’s argument in Lafler v. [read post]
24 May 2012, 3:46 am
Frye, but haven’t mentioned the companion case, Lafler v. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 8:02 am
For example, his 2012 dissent in Lafler v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:00 am
I could write about what a huge “step forward” this is for the rights of accused people when it comes to plea bargains, and call it “the single greatest revolution in the criminal justice process since Gideon v. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 7:18 am
Frye [9] and Lafler v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 11:27 am
That was the situation in the two cases that the Supreme Court lumped together for this ruling - Lafler v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 7:52 pm
In two sure to be seminal cases, Lafler v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 6:51 am
” And in Lafler v. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 9:34 pm
Board of Freeholders, No. 10-945, asks whether people arrested and held for minor offenses may be routinely strip-searched.The court will also consider, in Maples v. [read post]
