Search for: "Peoples v. Pennsylvania Power & Light Co" Results 61 - 80 of 95
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
The incarnation of the people of England (represented as was customary for the time by its classes―king, lords temporal and spiritual, and commons) would have viewed an unconstrained common law as constraining its ability to “make” law, that is to use the power of commanding behavior instrumentally. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 10:09 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Online stalking and threats are hot topics today, especially in light of the Supreme Court granting cert in US v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
”  A state legislature’s constitutional inability to favor particular federal legislative candidates and disfavor others explains why the Supreme Court held a dozen years ago in Cook v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:04 pm by Roshonda Scipio
Fontham.Fontham, Michael R.Boulder, CO : National Institute for Trial Advocacy, (c) 2013.KF8915 .F64 2013 Evidence Lights, camera, evidence! [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 4:00 am by Devlin Hartline
” He claimed that anyone referring to infringement as “stealing” is “trying to redefine words in a very dishonest way to frame the debate in a factually incorrect light. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 7:52 pm by Larry Catá Backer
Jindal Global University; Formerly Professor and Dean, Faculty of Law, University of Delhi, India Enforcing Socio-Economic Rights through Public Interest Litigation: An Overview of the Indian Experience 3) Dr Leïla Choukroune, Senior Lecturer in International Economic Law, Faculty of Law, Maastricht University, The Netherlands The Paradox of Justiciability: Labour PIL in China and India Questions/Comments 6:30pm-8:30pm – Welcome Dinner hosted by the City University Law School (by… [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
It has chased away much darkness from the civilized parts of the world, and spread light and knowledge in our path. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 12:49 am by Marie Louise
ITC (ITC 337 Update) District Court E D Pennsylvania: Stay pending reissue: Timing and blog reliability: Tyco Fire Products v Victaulic (Patently-O) District Court E D Texas: Defense win on fringement & invalidity in Judge Davis’ court: Alcatel-Lucent v. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 2:04 pm by WIMS
They say that the defendants' failure to close down parts of the CAWS to avert the crisis creates a grave risk of harm, in violation of the federal common law of public nuisance, see American Electric Power Co., Inc. v. [read post]