Search for: "Peoples v. Pennsylvania Power & Light Co"
Results 81 - 95
of 95
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Aug 2010, 1:07 pm
A town of about 40,000 people, it is the county seat for Luzerne, in the northeast part of the state. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
We have very bright people on our side. [read post]
13 May 2010, 1:40 pm
Florida Power & Light Co., 511 U.S. 222 (1994). [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 10:44 am
Click Here American Trucking Association et al. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 5:00 am
In Piper Aircraft Co. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
December 14, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm
The warming climate is driving several thousand people north, to Copenhagen — for two weeks, anyway. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 9:11 pm
The court threw new obstacles Friday in front of the Sevier Power Co. by requiring a substantial updating of its air-pollution permit for a 270-megawatt, $600 million electric generator in Sigurd. [read post]
27 Dec 2008, 10:19 am
According to Diogenes Laërtius, this was to convince the people of his time that he had been taken up by the gods on Olympus. * 272 BC: Pyrrhus of Epirus, the famous conquerer and source of the term pyrrhic victory, according to Plutarch died while fighting an urban battle in Argos on the back of an elephant when an old woman threw a roof tile at him, stunning him and allowing an Argive soldier to kill him. * 270 BC: Philitas of Cos, Greek intellectual,… [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 6:10 pm
Inst. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
’ paper by Graeme Clark SC (IP Down Under) Full Federal Court decision concerning brand reputation in context of ‘lookalike’ products and famous brands: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) Federal Court holds that grace period applicable to a ‘parent patent’ is different to that of its divisional ‘child’: Mont Adventure Equipment v Phoenix Leisure Group (IP Down… [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 1:12 am
In one case, Riegel v. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 2:47 am
Supreme Court to reconsider in light of Carey v. [read post]
3 May 2007, 10:20 am
People get shot. [read post]
25 Feb 2007, 9:09 pm
When the people adopted the "privileges or immunities" clause of the 14th amendment, they meant that the states had no power to deprive citizens of rights guaranteed by the federal Constitution. [read post]