Search for: "Peoples v. State"
Results 141 - 160
of 44,931
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2009, 11:05 am
Davis, Case No. 282994, holding that People v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
Chapter 14The States and the People; Popular ReferendaI. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 8:01 am
United States. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 8:55 pm
The case sits within a longer and ongoing story regarding the interaction between First Nations peoples and the Australian settler colonial state. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 1:00 am
The islands’ indigenous population, known as Chaogossians, was a very small community of fewer than 1,000 people who lived in extremely simple lifestyle. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 9:11 am
See, e.g., People v. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:43 am
In Barenblatt v. [read post]
12 Nov 2024, 7:28 am
In State v. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 7:29 am
I appreciate the chance to engage with CoOp readers on the United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 9:05 pm
A unanimous Supreme Court ruling in Timbs v. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 11:16 am
In The People of the State of New York v. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 1:12 pm
However, the prosecution relied on the case of People v. [read post]
5 May 2014, 4:54 pm
People v Kanhai Court Discusses Whether Business Records are an Exception to the Hearsay Rule under the Principle of Crawford v Washington The criminal defendant was arrested and charged for one count of of driving a motor vehicle while impaired by alcohol DWI under section 1192(1) of the Vehicle and Traffic Law. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 1:52 pm
For example, they're not going to overrule New York Times v. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 1:33 pm
The reported decision, Dunn v. [read post]
28 Oct 2018, 4:24 pm
In State v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 11:35 am
The California Supreme Court case of two juveniles caught throwing a cherry bomb at a hill that set off a large-scale brush fire was recently decided by the The People v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 2:31 pm
However, this ground was without merit as a deficiency in the chain of custody did not affect the admissibility but only affected the weight of the evidence as stated in the People v Hawkins, 11 NY3d at 494. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 3:42 am
Back in 1998, in State v. [read post]
