Search for: "Perdios v Perdios"
Results 1 - 13
of 13
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2014, 2:40 pm
Mr Perdios should need no introduction to regular readers, and we have visited the ‘contracting out reviews’ issue in Shacklady v Flintshire and most recently in Tachie, Terera and Il v Welwyn Hatfield BC [2013] EWHC 3972 (QB) [our report]. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 2:40 pm
Mr Perdios should need no introduction to regular readers, and we have visited the ‘contracting out reviews’ issue in Shacklady v Flintshire and most recently in Tachie, Terera and Il v Welwyn Hatfield BC [2013] EWHC 3972 (QB) [our report]. [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 12:42 pm
Falastin Amin v Brent LBC, Wandsworth County Court 2011A county court s.204 appeal on the issue of eligibility of an EU citizen as a ‘wroker’. [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 12:42 pm
Falastin Amin v Brent LBC, Wandsworth County Court 2011A county court s.204 appeal on the issue of eligibility of an EU citizen as a ‘wroker’. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 9:36 am
The Court of Appeal’s judgment in Heald and others v LB Brent [2009] EWCA Civ 930 is just out concerning the outsourcing of s 202 Housing Act 1996 reviews by Brent to Minos Perdios’ company Housing Reviews Ltd. [read post]
22 Oct 2017, 4:18 pm
Panayiotou v Waltham Forest and Smith v Haringey. [read post]
31 May 2009, 10:24 am
And deciding Art 6 compliance requires a view to the composite decision-making process, including but not limited to the judicial review process (R (Alconbury Developments Limited) v SS for the Environment, Transport and Regions [2003] 2 AC 295, Runa Begum [2003] 2 AC 430 and Adan v Newham LBC [2002] 1 WLR 2120. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 7:53 am
(no recuerdo el monto) desde entonces NO SE VOLVIÓ A AUMENTAR, han pasado C ATORCE AÑOS de ello, las pensiones que se siguen aumentando vía el FONAPHU son las del régimen de la 20530 QUE SE CERRÓ EL AÑO 2003, si mal no recuerdo, en montos que oscilan entre los 15 y 25 nuevos soles anuales, ¿por qué? [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 3:55 pm
Ward v LB Haringey. [read post]
12 Apr 2020, 11:17 am
McMahon v Watford Borough Council (2020) EWCA Civ 497 (and Kiefer v Hertsmere Borough Council ) We saw the approach of the Court of Appeal to the operation of the Public Sector Equality Duty (PSED) in possession proceedings in Luton Community Housing v Durdana. [read post]
2 Feb 2014, 3:30 pm
The review decision by the contracted out reviewer, Minos Perdios, had acknowledged Ms K’s subjective feeling that the property was not reasonable but, following Ahmed v Leicester City Council [2007] EWCA Civ 843, he considered that the evidence was such that her beliefs were not objectively reasonable. [read post]
2 Feb 2014, 3:30 pm
The review decision by the contracted out reviewer, Minos Perdios, had acknowledged Ms K’s subjective feeling that the property was not reasonable but, following Ahmed v Leicester City Council [2007] EWCA Civ 843, he considered that the evidence was such that her beliefs were not objectively reasonable. [read post]
25 Sep 2016, 3:41 pm
S Butt v London Borough of Hackney. [read post]
