Search for: "Perez v. Cox*"
Results 1 - 9
of 9
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2010, 9:12 am
Perez, 391 N.J. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 7:09 am
By Lisa Milam-Perez, J.D. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 6:45 am
” The e-mail, said the court, “did not reference any official designation of the Hearing Officer” by Coxsackie-Athens and, citing Perez v New York State Dept. of Labor, 244 AD2d 844, ruled that the school district’s reliance on such a writing was insufficient to meet the specific requirement of Civil Service Law §75(2). [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 10:28 am
Perez, 484 F.3d 735 (2007). [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
Ellis v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 am
Perez, Secretary, Department of Labor, 792 F.3d 554 (5th Cir. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 12:12 pm
For starters, there was the unique "direct to consumer" exception to the learned intermediary rule that the Supreme Court had adopted in Perez v. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
National/Federal DeJoy Maintains Financial Ties to Former Company as USPS Awards It New $120 Million Contract MSN – Jacob Bogage (Washington Post) | Published: 8/6/2021 The U.S. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 9:15 am
• Lester V. [read post]
