Search for: "Perez v. Federal National" Results 1 - 20 of 293
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2010, 2:21 pm by Albert Wan
 From the opinion in Perez: A decision of the Supreme Court should not be applied retroactively if it creates a “new rule” which “`breaks new ground or imposes a new obligation on the States or the Federal Government . . . . [read post]
2 May 2013, 2:25 pm by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Perez, a Harvard Law School graduate and current federal prosecutor with a long track record of defending civil rights and vulnerable workers, to become the next U.S. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 9:44 am by Cynthia L. Hackerott
In addition to its non-discrimination provisions, E.O. 11246 requires covered federal contractors to implement affirmative action programs on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, and national origin. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 4:47 pm
Nelson in 1972, a view that has been rejected by every other federal court since United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 6:00 am
As a result of a federal court decision on March 4, 2015 (Perez v. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 6:04 am by Amy Howe
Coverage and commentary continue for Monday’s decision in Perez v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 11:42 am by Stephen D. Rosenberg
Or do you believe that ERISA is a federal statute intended, from the outset, to be developed along the way by regulators and the federal courts, so as to fit current circumstances and to avoid being hamstrung by changes in the retirement world over the past 40 years? [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 1:15 pm by Robin Shea
The National Federation of Independent Business leads this group of plaintiffs, and has filed suit in federal court in Texas, which is in the Fifth Circuit. [read post]