Search for: "Perez v. Superintendent"
Results 1 - 11
of 11
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2022, 10:00 am
Alphabet LinkedIn Isn’t a State Actor–Perez v. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 8:12 am
By Lisa Milam-Perez, J.D. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 7:01 am
By Lisa Milam-Perez, J.D. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 9:31 am
A challenge to a policy that prohibited inmates confined to their cells for disciplinary infractions from attending religious services was dismissed as moot since the policy has been changed.In Perez v. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 3:35 am
Perez Moya v City of New York (9 Misc 3d 332 Sup Ct, Kings County 2005)(Superintendent's knowledge of the residency of child imputed to the City); Polidori v Societe Generale Group., 236 NYLJ 112 (Sup Ct NY County 2006) (Knowledge of sexual harassment will be imputed to employer if supervisor of a sufficiently high level is aware of the harassment), affd, 39 AD3d 404 (1st Dept 2007). [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 8:59 am
Appellate Court Cases Not Originating with Appeals Board Perez (Anel) v. [read post]
18 Jan 2009, 10:45 am
HOME, Link v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am
In Francis v. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 7:39 am
Box 1028 Rhinelander, WI 54501 Phone: (715) 365-2525 Web: http://www.bfm.org/naaa Bureau of Aging & Long Term Care Resources 217 South Hamilton Street, Suite 300 Madison, WI 53703 Phone: (608) 266-2536; (608) 267-3201; (800) 242-1060 (Toll Free) ADA Regional ADA & IT Technical Assistance Center Great Lakes ADA and Accessible IT Center University of Illinois/Chicago Institute on Disability and Human Development 1640 West Roosevelt Road Chicago, IL 60608 Phone: (312) 413-1407… [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am
National/Federal Campaigns Say They’ll Match Political Contributions. [read post]
9 Oct 2006, 5:12 pm
Contrary to his colleagues, Member Walsh would affirm the judge's finding that: (1) CEO Beck unlawfully solicited grievances and impliedly promised to remedy them; (2) Rojas unlawfully interrogated employees Natividad Felix and Henrietta Perez; (3) the Respondent unlawfully refused to allow surgical technician Mullanix-Ackerman to withdraw her resignation; and (4) the Respondent violated the Act by maintaining a policy prohibiting solicitation and distribution by nonemployees on its… [read post]
