Search for: "Perez v. Superior Court"
Results 61 - 80
of 91
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2016, 6:10 am
This post examines an opinion from the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts,Suffolk: Commonwealth v. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 6:20 am
Upon that filing, the statement or order, as the case may be, shall have the same effect and may be collected and docketed in the same manner as judgments rendered in causes tried in the Superior Court. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:00 am
” Perez v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 5:03 am
As far as I can tell, this particular Superior Court is a trial court, not an appellate court. [read post]
17 May 2008, 5:14 pm
The California Supreme Court relied on its own decision invalidating an anti-miscegenation law, Perez v. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 2:57 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, December 17, 2008 US v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:26 pm
Raich v. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 11:24 am
What meaning this old ruling, Perez v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm
Visciotti and its progeny, by finding a state court’s application of Beck v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:37 am
Superior Court, 920 P.2d 1347, 1354 (Cal. 1996); Brown v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
The Cassidys and their son Daniel subsequently cross-complained against Blix Street for royalties allegedly owing.2 The trial of the case commenced in March of 2006, presided over by Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Lee Edmon. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
The Cassidys and their son Daniel subsequently cross-complained against Blix Street for royalties allegedly owing.2 The trial of the case commenced in March of 2006, presided over by Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Lee Edmon. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 8:39 am
(IP Dragon) (ContentAgenda) Europe Study by Institute of European Media Law: Blanket licence for non-commercial copies needed (Intellectual Property Watch) France French Parliament passes 3-strikes HADOPI law (Ars Technica) (Media Wonk) (TorrentFreak) (IPKat) (Out-Law) (Intellectual Property Watch) (TorrentFreak) (Ars Technica) (ContentAgenda) France to block Pirate Bay (TorrentFreak) AdWords: French first instance court condemns the advertiser: Onixxa v… [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
Superior Court, 920 P.2d 1347, 1354 (Cal. 1996); Brown v. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 12:12 pm
For starters, there was the unique "direct to consumer" exception to the learned intermediary rule that the Supreme Court had adopted in Perez v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
Supreme Court, January 22, 2008 Ali v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 12:05 am
Sarmiento-Perez, 724 F.2d 898, 900 (11th Cir. 1984). [read post]
29 Nov 2008, 11:47 am
o SCOTUS docket hereFederal Appellate Court DecisionsØ Paul Mollica's Daily Developments in EEO Law here6th CircuitMadden v. [read post]
Negligence applies to quid pro quo claim where jilted HR employee lobbied to fire her would-be lover
29 May 2014, 7:55 am
Giving a male general manager a chance to put before a jury his claim that he was terminated based on lobbying by a female human resources employee whose romantic and sexual advances he had repeatedly rebuffed, the appeals court vacated in part the district court’s grant of summary judgment to the employer (Velazquez-Perez v Developers Diversified Realty Corp, May 23, 2014, Kayatta, W). [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 7:39 am
The first is United States v. [read post]
