Search for: "Perez v. Superior Court" Results 61 - 80 of 91
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jan 2011, 1:29 pm by Gary A. Watt
Superior Court (1992) 3 Cal. 4th 797, 804.) [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 4:05 am
Employee conduct must be “in furtherance of the employee’s business” for it to be held liable for the employee’s negligent acts as Respondeat SuperiorPerez v City of New York, 2010 NY Slip Op 09237, Decided on December 14, 2010, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentNew York City police officer Javier Colon accidentally discharged his weapon in the course of unloading it while off-duty and engaged in "personal business," mortally wounding George Perez.The… [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am by stevemehta
The Cassidys and their son Daniel subsequently cross-complained against Blix Street for royalties allegedly owing.2 The trial of the case commenced in March of 2006, presided over by Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Lee Edmon. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am by stevemehta
The Cassidys and their son Daniel subsequently cross-complained against Blix Street for royalties allegedly owing.2 The trial of the case commenced in March of 2006, presided over by Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Lee Edmon. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 3:00 am by John Day
FN10 This factor is derived from the doctrine of “secondary implied assumption of risk” that was abolished in Perez v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 3:57 am
Citing the Court of Appeals ruling in Wiggins v Board of Education, 60 NY2d 385, the Appellate Division said that because there was no written designation appointing the hearing officer, the appointing authority “lacked jurisdiction” to maintain the initial disciplinary proceeding against Perez. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 5:03 am by Susan Brenner
As far as I can tell, this particular Superior Court is a trial court, not an appellate court. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 6:20 am by Jon L. Gelman
Upon that filing, the statement or order, as the case may be, shall have the same effect and may be collected and docketed in the same manner as judgments rendered in causes tried in the Superior Court. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 10:33 am by Joe Mullin
Those lawyers-Texas solo Dan Perez and Michigan-based Patrick Anderson, both of whom frequently work for Spangenberg and his patent companies-quickly hammered out the $4.2 million settlement. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 8:39 am
(IP Dragon) (ContentAgenda)   Europe Study by Institute of European Media Law: Blanket licence for non-commercial copies needed (Intellectual Property Watch)   France French Parliament passes 3-strikes HADOPI law (Ars Technica) (Media Wonk) (TorrentFreak) (IPKat) (Out-Law) (Intellectual Property Watch) (TorrentFreak) (Ars Technica) (ContentAgenda) France to block Pirate Bay (TorrentFreak) AdWords: French first instance court condemns the advertiser: Onixxa v… [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 2:57 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, December 17, 2008 US v. [read post]
29 Nov 2008, 11:47 am
o SCOTUS docket hereFederal Appellate Court DecisionsØ Paul Mollica's Daily Developments in EEO Law here6th CircuitMadden v. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 6:33 pm
For publication opinions today (1): In Joshua Perez-Grahovac v. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 11:30 pm
Superior Court, ___ Cal.App 4th ___ (2008), the Fourth District Court of Appeal held that “meal periods need only be made available, not ensured. [read post]