Search for: "Perez v. U. S"
Results 1 - 20
of 116
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2023, 8:15 pm
’” Perez v. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am
These allegations are consistent with the Department of Justice’s court filings in Cohen’s federal criminal case. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 8:42 am
In Perez v. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 3:55 am
JOIN TODAY -- FREE MEMBERSHIP (BrokeAndBroker.com Blog) MIGUEL LUNA PEREZ, PETITIONER v. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 3:55 am
JOIN TODAY -- FREE MEMBERSHIP (BrokeAndBroker.com Blog) MIGUEL LUNA PEREZ, PETITIONER v. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 9:35 am
This argument turned on the interpretation of 11-U D.C.M.R. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 8:03 am
§551(5); see Perez v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am
In Francis v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
Redistricting — which is "primarily the duty and responsibility of the State" (Perry v Perez, 565 US 388, 392 [2012] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Growe v Emison, 507 US 25, 34 [1993]) — is a complex and contentious process that, historically, has been "within the legislative power . . . subject to constitutional regulation and limitation" (Matter of Orans, 15 NY2d 339, 352 [1965]). [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
Redistricting — which is "primarily the duty and responsibility of the State" (Perry v Perez, 565 US 388, 392 [2012] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Growe v Emison, 507 US 25, 34 [1993]) — is a complex and contentious process that, historically, has been "within the legislative power . . . subject to constitutional regulation and limitation" (Matter of Orans, 15 NY2d 339, 352 [1965]). [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 9:06 am
The Supreme Court's 2015 S. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 7:09 am
The court says Prager U expressly rejected that argument. [read post]
20 Nov 2021, 10:33 am
Nov. 18, 2021) The court literally could not be bothered to explain itself beyond a cite to Prager U: The district court properly dismissed Perez’s action because Perez failed to allege facts sufficient to state a plausible claim….see also Prager U. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 7:33 am
This argument is foreclosed by Prager U. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 6:40 am
” Cite to Prager U. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 5:21 am
Grischuk's convenience. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 3:50 am
Improvements to the IRS’s technological infrastructure could reduce the tax gap while not creating new burdens for taxpayers. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 9:38 am
Facebook and Prager U. v YouTube. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 7:15 am
Alphabet LinkedIn Isn’t a State Actor–Perez v. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 7:24 am
Google; Prager U. v. [read post]