Search for: "Perez v. U. S. Government"
Results 1 - 20
of 47
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2023, 8:15 pm
’” Perez v. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am
We describe the law governing offenses involving false statements to tax authorities regardless of whether a defendant’s conduct includes an underpayment or other form of evasion of taxes. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 9:35 am
This argument turned on the interpretation of 11-U D.C.M.R. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 8:03 am
§551(5); see Perez v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am
In Francis v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
Redistricting — which is "primarily the duty and responsibility of the State" (Perry v Perez, 565 US 388, 392 [2012] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Growe v Emison, 507 US 25, 34 [1993]) — is a complex and contentious process that, historically, has been "within the legislative power . . . subject to constitutional regulation and limitation" (Matter of Orans, 15 NY2d 339, 352 [1965]). [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
Redistricting — which is "primarily the duty and responsibility of the State" (Perry v Perez, 565 US 388, 392 [2012] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Growe v Emison, 507 US 25, 34 [1993]) — is a complex and contentious process that, historically, has been "within the legislative power . . . subject to constitutional regulation and limitation" (Matter of Orans, 15 NY2d 339, 352 [1965]). [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 7:09 am
The court says Prager U expressly rejected that argument. [read post]
20 Nov 2021, 10:33 am
Nov. 18, 2021) The court literally could not be bothered to explain itself beyond a cite to Prager U: The district court properly dismissed Perez’s action because Perez failed to allege facts sufficient to state a plausible claim….see also Prager U. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 7:33 am
This argument is foreclosed by Prager U. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 3:50 am
Revenue Potential from Greater Tax Enforcement Tax Compliance Costs and Optimal Tax Enforcement Fundamental Tax Reform Conclusion Key Findings The tax gap is the gap between what taxpayers owe the U.S. government, and what the government actually collects from taxpayers. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 9:38 am
Facebook and Prager U. v YouTube. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 7:24 am
Google; Prager U. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 8:21 am
Alphabet LinkedIn Isn’t a State Actor–Perez v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 11:17 am
” The Prager U v. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 11:17 am
The case, Department of Homeland Security (DHS) v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 4:35 pm
§ 16(b), as incorporated into the Immigration and Nationality Act’s provisions governing an alien’s removal from the United States, is unconstitutionally vague. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am
But the government waived its right to file a responsive brief, so unless [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 6:47 am
§ 16(b), as incorporated into the Immigration and Nationality Act’s provisions governing an alien’s removal from the United States, is unconstitutionally vague. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 6:07 pm
§ 16(b), as incorporated into the Immigration and Nationality Act’s provisions governing an alien’s removal from the United States, is unconstitutionally vague. [read post]
