Search for: "Perfecting Service Co. v. PRODUCT DEVELOP. & SALES CO."
Results 1 - 20
of 49
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2017, 5:15 am
The franchise operation sold the SKINDERM range of products and developed the “HeadStart salon management system”. [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 3:55 pm
Kellogg Sales Co., 2005 WI 111, ¶42, 283 Wis. 2d 555, 699 N.W.2d 205. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 2:27 pm
Early developmentThe point of an evolving concept was illustrated further by reference to the leading case of Cadbury Schweppes Pty Ltd v Pub Squash Co. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 7:28 am
The court says Hartford Casualty Insurance Co. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 1:38 pm
” The same disclaimer appeared.In Mohawk Maintenance Co. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 10:59 am
v. [read post]
6 Jan 2008, 9:09 pm
Maisel-Hollins Development Co. et al Young Again Products, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 10:01 am
Murder case on Tinder, which was v. helpful. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 9:53 am
In Taubman Co. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 1:54 pm
Co. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 11:33 am
The court found that the V3 product infringes JVW’s patent, while the V4 product does not. [read post]
21 Feb 2010, 8:31 am
Although Co-op’s directors authorized the manager to hedge, only a minimal amount was effectively hedged (US$20,500 out US$7,300,000 of Co-op’s total grain sales)[6]. [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 3:00 am
(IP Dragon) Columbia Sportswear successful in reducing counterfeits in China (IP Dragon) Shenyang Intermediate People’s Court orders New Apple Concept Technology to pay Apple 400,000 Yuan in damages for trade mark infringement and unfair competition (DeBund) 2386 IPR cases dealt with by Culture Administrations in Q3 (DeBund) Well-known trade marks can be recognised on basis of the products’ sales volumes (DeBund) Judicial Criteria for copyright cases (part 2)… [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 6:41 am
Hutchinson v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 3:35 am
Denver Mattress Co., LLC (not precedential) (TTABlog) 9th Circuit: Judicial estoppel does not bar trade dress theory: Larin Corp. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 3:35 am
Denver Mattress Co., LLC (not precedential) (TTABlog) 9th Circuit: Judicial estoppel does not bar trade dress theory: Larin Corp. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 3:02 pm
Output measures: consumer sales, use in publications. [read post]
9 May 2012, 5:54 am
But if a smellalike looks like our product (Lagy Gaga v. [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 9:48 pm
We'd much rather see actual trials, since practice makes perfect.6. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 12:10 pm
Alcede points to a gun show tweet as an example of a personal tweet—i.e., one that didn’t advertise any products or services. [read post]
