Search for: "Performance Impressions, LLC"
Results 21 - 40
of 414
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Aug 2023, 8:12 am
The Securities and Exchange Commission charged Titan Global Capital Management USA LLC, a New York-based FinTech investment adviser, for using hypothetical performance metrics in advertisements that were misleading. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 7:21 am
If you’re like most people, you care about your job and want to perform well to provide for your family and to impress your employer. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 4:08 am
One statute of frauds commonly applied to partnerships: oral agreements that cannot be performed within one year, which are prohibited under GOL § 5-701 (a) (1). [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 10:47 am
On February 2, 2012, the Colorado Court of Appeals answered two questions of first impression under the Construction Defect Action Reform Act (“CDARA”) in Shaw Construction, LLC v. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 12:01 am
Earlier today, BNA Subsidiaries, LLC voluntarily filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in Delaware. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 4:14 pm
makes clear, that question is indeed a matter of first impression. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 4:44 am
First, it is an extraordinarily rare example of a business valuation performed by a court solely on paper submissions without a trial. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 8:48 am
Copying the performance appraisal was protected by the LAD. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 9:59 am
BPI Sports, LLC v. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 8:00 am
Dale Brink and the defendant Performance Foot and Ankle LLC, is prohibited from conducting ex parte communications with McChristian’s treating podiatrist, Dr. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 8:00 am
Dale Brink and the defendant Performance Foot and Ankle LLC, is prohibited from conducting ex parte communications with McChristian’s treating podiatrist, Dr. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 7:17 am
After reviewing those websites, the Board was not much impressed. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 3:49 am
BGK Trademark Holdings, LLC, Opposition No. 91234467 (June 30, 2020)[not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Mark Lebow).Likelihood of Confusion: Applicant BGK argued that the marks at issue create different commercial impressions, since BLUE IVY CARTER refers to a famous child. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 3:45 am
Destroyer Promotional Products, LLC, Opposition No. 91252176 (November 1,2023) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Angela Lykos). [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 3:35 am
McCormick, considering this issue of apparent first impression, sided with Walsh and Devlin. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 3:05 am
Not only is that word in larger font, but as the first part of the mark it is the portion most likely to be impressed upon the consumer's mind and remembered. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 1:45 pm
The new law addresses to some extent California's Second District Appellate Court's decision in The Fifth Day, LLC v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 11:41 am
Past performance is, of course, not a guarantee of future results – particularly here, where the unique circumstances of PMCM’s feat are not likely to occur again. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 12:30 pm
The Fifth Day, LLC v. [read post]
23 Jul 2011, 9:36 am
At the urging of Chief Ramsdell, written performance evaluations were instituted at TPD for the first time in its 127-year history. [read post]
