Search for: "Perry v. United States" Results 421 - 440 of 1,125
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2011, 7:00 am by Joshua Matz
United States, a case that presents questions about the relationship between religious speech and political speech for purposes of tax exemptions. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 1:27 am by Rich Cassidy
And as I suspected he might do, Professor Tribe spent a moment talking about PERRY v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 10:13 am by Steven Kaufhold - Guest
” Assistant to the Solicitor General Curtis Gannon argued on behalf of the United States as an amicus supporting First Derivative. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 7:07 am by Marci Hamilton
Perry, that a Ten Commandments monument on the Texas statehouse grounds was not. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 8:45 pm by Jason Mazzone
Perhaps there is other language from the legislative history which also supports a prospective reading of section 4.Finally, we have Perry v. [read post]
8 Dec 2007, 6:12 pm
Twenty-five years ago, Texas carried outthe first execution by lethal injection in the United States. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 4:05 am by Marty Lederman
Participating States must also comply with various other requirements, including those that protect against waste, fraud, and abuse; those that protect the health and safety, and the privacy, of Medicaid beneficiaries; those that ensure that the States adequately accomplish the goals of the program (see the recent decision in Douglas v. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 9:03 am by Timothy P. Flynn
 Court watchers equate the Perry case to that of Brown v Board of Education (abolishing the "separate but equal" fallacy in public schools) and Loving v Virginia (holding that a state could not prohibit interracial marriages).Whatever the outcome of the trial, an intermediate appeal to the Ninth Circuit is guaranteed to send this one to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 8:52 am by Timothy P. Flynn, Esq.
 Court watchers equate the Perry case to that of Brown v Board of Education (abolishing the "separate but equal" fallacy in public schools) and Loving v Virginia (holding that a state could not prohibit interracial marriages).Whatever the outcome of the trial, an intermediate appeal to the Ninth Circuit is guaranteed to send this one to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 1:10 pm by Margaret Wood
United States, was heard before the U.S. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 8:00 am by Ronald Mann
The most noteworthy point in the argument came almost immediately after Benjamin Horwich rose to argue for the United States. [read post]